WPM

Discuss whatever insanity comes to mind. Please keep it friendly and clean though.

Moderator: General Mods

adventure_of_link
Locksmith of Hyrule
Posts: 3634
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
Location: 255.255.255.255
Contact:

Post by adventure_of_link »

For some reason, all two times I've taken the test it didn't measure my Net speed or my accuracy, but this time I did get 57 GWPM
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
byuu

Post by byuu »

Are you saying you're 120 WPM @ 100%? I do find that a little hard to believe, if only for the 100% accuracy. But hey, I'm not here to judge.
Hah, what a coincidence.

My score with 3 minutes on "The Enchanted Typewriter."

Image

Sorry for using IE, but I have Java disabled in Firefox.

I actually had 125wpm + 98% as my best score, but I'm a perfectionist, so I tried a few more times until I got 100%. Which of course wore me out a bit, hence the lower score.

Note that I don't actually always type perfectly, I am just really fast at backspacing out my mistakes and continuing. And I swear, that is the most annoying software in the world, as it doesn't let you backspace once you hit the spacebar, so I had to restart at least five freaking times.

Still, it's higher than the 110wpm I got last time I took one of these tests. Hoorah!

Feel free to believe my score, or don't. This test particularly sucks because it's easy to just edit your score in the URI, if you want to.
Snark
Trooper
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:17 pm

Post by Snark »

Pretty good results byuu. (though coming from a slow typer that doesn't mean much I guess)
byuu wrote: This test particularly sucks because it's easy to just edit your score in the URI, if you want to.
LOL And I assume that's only "normal" Sayan level or whatever it's supposed to be called.

edit:

Behold, Slowness Ultimacy

(Though in reality I'm not sure that would actually count as slow...As in, maybe that would mean I would have finished typing before I even begun or something...)
grinvader
ZSNES Shake Shake Prinny
Posts: 5632
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: PAL50, dood !

Post by grinvader »

50 WPM, 100%.

I suck at typing stuff I'm not thinking about/have to read. Blame the serial brain bus. Next time I'll get a parallel one, I guess.
皆黙って俺について来い!!

Code: Select all

<jmr> bsnes has the most accurate wiki page but it takes forever to load (or something)
Pantheon: Gideon Zhi | CaitSith2 | Nach | kode54
Panzer88
Inmate
Posts: 1485
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:28 am
Location: Salem, Oregon
Contact:

Post by Panzer88 »

grinvader wrote:50 WPM, 100%.

I suck at typing stuff I'm not thinking about/have to read. Blame the serial brain bus. Next time I'll get a parallel one, I guess.
totally, it sucks, I'm exactly the same way.
[quote="byuu"]Seriously, what kind of asshole makes an old-school 2D emulator that requires a Core 2 to get full speed? [i]>:([/i] [/quote]
whicker
Trooper
Posts: 479
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:33 am

Post by whicker »

64 WPM
100% accuracy

this is with fricken cold hands.

Edit: ahahaha. Tried it again, and got stupid "update me" popups for zonealarm and java. completely killed my accuracy typing into a popup box.

:P
pagefault
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 812
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 5:24 am
Location: In your garden

Post by pagefault »

This test is boring. I need beer to complete it.
Watering ur plants.
Post Reply