TFT/LCD Contrast: 700:1, good enough for 2D/3Dgames & An

Feel free to discuss anything gaming related.

Moderator: General Mods

creaothceann
Seen it all
Posts: 2302
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 5:04 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by creaothceann »

Cyrus wrote:But I assume most 32bit monitors use 24bit + 8bits for the alpha channel (which is used for transparencies, right?), since 2^32 colours is just pointless.
Yeah. Though an alpha channel might be good for bitmaps, but not for display devices. There's nothing behind it to look through...
vSNES | Delphi 10 BPLs
bsnes launcher with recent files list
ST Dragon
Hazed
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:46 pm

Post by ST Dragon »

funkyass wrote:
ST Dragon wrote: The quality of black is terrible, looks more like grey or blue. Also, when the screen was all black I noticed some very irritating backlight bleeding all around the edges of the screen, as if there were extra spot lights around the frame of the LCD.
unless you are willing to spend big bucks on a LED backlight, then you have to live with it, all LCD monitors inside your price range suffer from this

get a syncmaster 940, its a good monitor.
Even PVA Panel TFTs suffer from this?
The EIZO 1931 review is quite good, nice dark black & image quality.
http://www.prad.de/en/monitore/review-e ... agequality
Firon
Trooper
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:37 pm
Contact:

Post by Firon »

THe problem with PVA (and make sure it's S-PVA!) is that the response time sucks.
kick
Trooper
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by kick »

Until I see 120Hz refresh rates,at least 1080p resolution,LED backlights and less dead pixels I'm not thinking of buying an LCD.

CRTs can still do much better: 1536p resolution,better contrast and colors,no lag,no dead pixels.
(OK,there's the huge Apple Cinema HD display,but its price is far from affordable)
snkcube
Hero of Time
Posts: 2646
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:49 am
Location: In front of the monitor
Contact:

Post by snkcube »

kick wrote:Until I see 120Hz refresh rates,at least 1080p resolution,LED backlights and less dead pixels I'm not thinking of buying an LCD.

CRTs can still do much better: 1536p resolution,better contrast and colors,no lag,no dead pixels.
(OK,there's the huge Apple Cinema HD display,but its price is far from affordable)
Dead pixels and lag are past issues of LCD. Seriously, go look for some GOOD ones.
Try out CCleaner and other free software at Piriform
Image
Firon
Trooper
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:37 pm
Contact:

Post by Firon »

The only issue left with LCDs is color gamut and black not being black. Both are gonna be improved greatly with LED backlights and localized dimming.
kick
Trooper
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by kick »

Don't forget the low resolution,low refresh rates and bad resampling to a non-native resolution.
But as I know,Samsung's gonna address these issues very soon.
So,now it's still not a good time to buy an LCD monitor.
sweener2001
Inmate
Posts: 1751
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:47 am
Location: WA

Post by sweener2001 »

refresh rates don't matter on an lcd. response time does.

twisting crystals, not an electron gun.
[img]http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c128/sweener2001/StewieSIGPIC.png[/img]
kick
Trooper
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by kick »

I know LCD refresh rate doesn't matter in general usage,but those new 120Hz Samsung displays do have a noticeable difference.
Also,this is important for emulators such as bsnes where PAL games have to be outputted at 100Hz to get accurate video emulation. Because no PC monitor supports 50Hz,the only way to get correct video emulation is to use 100Hz,so you need an LCD which supports 100Hz or better refresh rates.
Firon
Trooper
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:37 pm
Contact:

Post by Firon »

I doubt you can see the difference. With CRT I definitely could, but LCDs are a different beast.
And LCDs aren't low resolution...
kick
Trooper
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by kick »

And LCDs aren't low resolution...
If 1280x1024 (or even 1600x1200) is enough for your needs,then yes.
If I were to buy an LCD,I would need a SurroundView LCD setup (3x 1280x1024) :)
Firon
Trooper
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:37 pm
Contact:

Post by Firon »

Mine's 1680x1050, and some of my friends have 1920x1200. There's LCDs with even higher resolution than that.
Post Reply