kacpid, emerging firefox, and you..
Moderator: General Mods
-
- Locksmith of Hyrule
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
- Location: 255.255.255.255
- Contact:
kacpid, emerging firefox, and you..
system specs:
Intel Celeron 2.7GHz w/ 400MHz FSB and 128k L2 cache
Gentoo Linux 2.6.18-r2 kernel (2.6.17 doesn't exhibit this issue)
512MB of RAM
ACPI support, fan, thermal, and processor drivers are in my kernel
situation:
every time I emerge something like Firefox, eventually kacpid will eat a lot of my CPU time, and it won't go away until I reboot the computer. Note that this computer ran Windows before, and even though it initially ran quiet in Windows and only ran loud when I was running ePSXe or UT99. Linux (up till this 2.6.18-r2 kernel) was running fast and loud (like ~4300 RPM) all the time. Emerging large programs using 2.6.17 and older kernels always worked without a problem.
I even emerged acpi and acpid, and have acpid running at startup, and even then it was taking up some of my CPU time, but not much.
How do I fix this? Thanks for all useful and helpful input.
Intel Celeron 2.7GHz w/ 400MHz FSB and 128k L2 cache
Gentoo Linux 2.6.18-r2 kernel (2.6.17 doesn't exhibit this issue)
512MB of RAM
ACPI support, fan, thermal, and processor drivers are in my kernel
situation:
every time I emerge something like Firefox, eventually kacpid will eat a lot of my CPU time, and it won't go away until I reboot the computer. Note that this computer ran Windows before, and even though it initially ran quiet in Windows and only ran loud when I was running ePSXe or UT99. Linux (up till this 2.6.18-r2 kernel) was running fast and loud (like ~4300 RPM) all the time. Emerging large programs using 2.6.17 and older kernels always worked without a problem.
I even emerged acpi and acpid, and have acpid running at startup, and even then it was taking up some of my CPU time, but not much.
How do I fix this? Thanks for all useful and helpful input.
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
NSRT here.
Nice to know that Linux ACPI support is still somewhat broken. Revert to the older kernel? Search around the kernel archives to see if anything between 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 affects ACPI? (Oh yeah, and 2.6.18.3 appears to be the latest, so you can try that as well. Maybe after you revert, if kernel compiling is long enough to trigger the bug.)
(Wow chex it out, a Windows user who hasn't actively used Linux on a desktop machine for over a year offering advice. I rock. So tell me, is the stance on ACPI no longer that it's incomplete and that you should probably use APM support instead?)
(Wow chex it out, a Windows user who hasn't actively used Linux on a desktop machine for over a year offering advice. I rock. So tell me, is the stance on ACPI no longer that it's incomplete and that you should probably use APM support instead?)
Don't run r kernels, their testing, pretty much. Lord knows why they end up in stable.
There's no real reason to run bleeding edge kernels unless you need some freatures not presented in 2.6.17.
Regardless, why do you throttle your celeron desktop? I'm guessing its to keep noise down. The celeron is not a hot running CPU; I'd check to see how hot it runs, it might be Ok to always run it at a lower fan speed. Those very same fans run the Prescott. Or get a new one.
My desktop has the exact same CPU, and the stock chiller keeps it at 118 degrees. Its overclocked to 3.2Ghz.
There's no real reason to run bleeding edge kernels unless you need some freatures not presented in 2.6.17.
Regardless, why do you throttle your celeron desktop? I'm guessing its to keep noise down. The celeron is not a hot running CPU; I'd check to see how hot it runs, it might be Ok to always run it at a lower fan speed. Those very same fans run the Prescott. Or get a new one.
My desktop has the exact same CPU, and the stock chiller keeps it at 118 degrees. Its overclocked to 3.2Ghz.
SHREIK!!!!!!! DDdddnnnnnnaaaa! GESTAHLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!
Steelers now officially own your ass.
Steelers now officially own your ass.
-
- Locksmith of Hyrule
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
- Location: 255.255.255.255
- Contact:
Funkyass: Remind me.. where in the kernel config do I disable CPU throttling?
Kode: The older kernel works...
Kevman: Thanks, I didn't know the r kernels were testing.
And I didn't even know I was throttling the CPU...
Casualsax: I don't see why I'm not running a 686 kernel..
Kode: The older kernel works...
Kevman: Thanks, I didn't know the r kernels were testing.

Casualsax: I don't see why I'm not running a 686 kernel..
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
NSRT here.
under power options.adventure_of_link wrote:Funkyass: Remind me.. where in the kernel config do I disable CPU throttling?
Kode: The older kernel works...
Kevman: Thanks, I didn't know the r kernels were testing.And I didn't even know I was throttling the CPU...
Casualsax: I don't see why I'm not running a 686 kernel..
disable IO APIC - in CPU settings.
Does [Kevin] Smith masturbate with steel wool too?
- Yes, but don’t change the subject.
- Yes, but don’t change the subject.
-
- Locksmith of Hyrule
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
- Location: 255.255.255.255
- Contact:
I don't see it.. 

<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
NSRT here.
-
- Locksmith of Hyrule
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
- Location: 255.255.255.255
- Contact:
CPU Frequency scaling isn't enabled
EDIT: I found the IO APIC option, I needed to enable the Local APIC Support on uniprocessors function to see it. Should I be enabling the Local APIC in the first place?
EDIT: I found the IO APIC option, I needed to enable the Local APIC Support on uniprocessors function to see it. Should I be enabling the Local APIC in the first place?
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
NSRT here.
-
- Locksmith of Hyrule
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
- Location: 255.255.255.255
- Contact:
All my stuff works regardless of kernel
I was upgrading in case there were new security fixes and the like
so I should just de-integrate (or moduleize) the fan driver?
I was upgrading in case there were new security fixes and the like
so I should just de-integrate (or moduleize) the fan driver?
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
NSRT here.