Okay.... i guess this is the end huh?tcaudilllg2 wrote:That's insulting. But I guess you're hardly the creative fire behind ZSNES. so you probably wouldn't understand anyway.
See ya.... have a nice life tcaudilllg2



Moderator: General Mods
Okay.... i guess this is the end huh?tcaudilllg2 wrote:That's insulting. But I guess you're hardly the creative fire behind ZSNES. so you probably wouldn't understand anyway.
Prove it.Gil_Hamilton wrote:I said commercially viable, you nincompoop.tcaudilllg2 wrote:Who said anything about a forum? They've got an editorial page which I've contributed to before.
As for those who are arguing about things "becoming popular again", you're only demonstrating your insecurity and ignorance of the nature of popularity, thinking it has some kind of "magical" quality which it really doesn't.
But are old games really becoming popular again? Doubtful. At least, not enough to compete with newer games. (unless you're talking say, 50,000 sales copies or such) The bottom line is we're probably not going to see any of the as-yet untranslated SNES RPGs released (and there are 30 or more still yet...) released. Bottom line is the game gap is widening, not closing with literally hundreds of Saturn, PSX, GBA, and NDS games not released nor are there any plans to. Add to that the existence of the gaming media which uses its position of influence to lift up or drown stock RPG titles. The facts do not support a resurgence in the popularity of old games in general. (just because Zelda thrived on GBA, with its enormous cultural legacy, means next to nothing for obscure titles which never made it overseas).
The fact is, actively promoting fan translations of old games is a clear approval of piracy, at a time when the back catalog is becoming sellable again and piracy of old software is counter to the company's interests.
No, you!tcaudilllg2 wrote:Prove it.Gil_Hamilton wrote:I said commercially viable, you nincompoop.tcaudilllg2 wrote:Who said anything about a forum? They've got an editorial page which I've contributed to before.
As for those who are arguing about things "becoming popular again", you're only demonstrating your insecurity and ignorance of the nature of popularity, thinking it has some kind of "magical" quality which it really doesn't.
But are old games really becoming popular again? Doubtful. At least, not enough to compete with newer games. (unless you're talking say, 50,000 sales copies or such) The bottom line is we're probably not going to see any of the as-yet untranslated SNES RPGs released (and there are 30 or more still yet...) released. Bottom line is the game gap is widening, not closing with literally hundreds of Saturn, PSX, GBA, and NDS games not released nor are there any plans to. Add to that the existence of the gaming media which uses its position of influence to lift up or drown stock RPG titles. The facts do not support a resurgence in the popularity of old games in general. (just because Zelda thrived on GBA, with its enormous cultural legacy, means next to nothing for obscure titles which never made it overseas).
The fact is, actively promoting fan translations of old games is a clear approval of piracy, at a time when the back catalog is becoming sellable again and piracy of old software is counter to the company's interests.
You're only saying that because you have no proof at all. Do I? I know that the hardcore RPG gamer base in the states numbers about 5-600,000 people. Assessing the real potential of the market would be very difficult, although it's a safe bet that the sequel of a big-budget title, and that the people who bought the former will buy the latter. Even then, a minority of Americans play games regularly, chiefly because gaming is not a cultural staple of Americans. (going out to the bar or watching the football game is a much bigger deal for us...) For every non-cultural staple you can put half the market in the "maybe" category, because the ratio between traditionalist and reform minded people is 1:1. (this is what happened to Xenosaga, which angered traditionalists on a wide scale; it's not called "the most pretentious game ever" for nothing). You can also go ahead and subtract the sports game sales from the market in general, because it's only the people who watch the game who buy the sports titles. (regular sports gamers are not "mainstream" gamers; a visit to any used games store proves this: the sports titles are on average 50% cheaper than non-sports titles, reflecting lower demand). That leaves you only about half the regular gamer population willing to take a chance on an old game, by my estimate. This half has limited funds and lots of choices: should I buy XYZ new game with top notch graphics and "cool" characters for $39.99; or should I for that price buy five or six used games that may or may not be good, and that I've quite frankly never heard of? Probably some 80% or better of these gamers (of which we're talking about 4 million people, given typical sales for Final Fantasy which just about all regular gamers buy -- again, cut that in half because FF is an established property now. (FFVI only sold like, 600,000 copies US back in the 90s?) are going to opt for the new game over the old ones. So 20% of two million is... oh boy, 400,000 for the lot of the rest of 'em.... (unless it's icarus, zelda, megaman, or someone else we've ALREADY heard about and was long ago translated)).Gil_Hamilton wrote:No, you!tcaudilllg2 wrote:Prove it.Gil_Hamilton wrote:I said commercially viable, you nincompoop.tcaudilllg2 wrote:Who said anything about a forum? They've got an editorial page which I've contributed to before.
As for those who are arguing about things "becoming popular again", you're only demonstrating your insecurity and ignorance of the nature of popularity, thinking it has some kind of "magical" quality which it really doesn't.
But are old games really becoming popular again? Doubtful. At least, not enough to compete with newer games. (unless you're talking say, 50,000 sales copies or such) The bottom line is we're probably not going to see any of the as-yet untranslated SNES RPGs released (and there are 30 or more still yet...) released. Bottom line is the game gap is widening, not closing with literally hundreds of Saturn, PSX, GBA, and NDS games not released nor are there any plans to. Add to that the existence of the gaming media which uses its position of influence to lift up or drown stock RPG titles. The facts do not support a resurgence in the popularity of old games in general. (just because Zelda thrived on GBA, with its enormous cultural legacy, means next to nothing for obscure titles which never made it overseas).
The fact is, actively promoting fan translations of old games is a clear approval of piracy, at a time when the back catalog is becoming sellable again and piracy of old software is counter to the company's interests.
You can't really say it is "clear approval". It is more like silent approval. They can/will exercise their power at any time.Gil_Hamilton wrote:I said commercially viable, you nincompoop.tcaudilllg2 wrote:Who said anything about a forum? They've got an editorial page which I've contributed to before.
As for those who are arguing about things "becoming popular again", you're only demonstrating your insecurity and ignorance of the nature of popularity, thinking it has some kind of "magical" quality which it really doesn't.
But are old games really becoming popular again? Doubtful. At least, not enough to compete with newer games. (unless you're talking say, 50,000 sales copies or such) The bottom line is we're probably not going to see any of the as-yet untranslated SNES RPGs released (and there are 30 or more still yet...) released. Bottom line is the game gap is widening, not closing with literally hundreds of Saturn, PSX, GBA, and NDS games not released nor are there any plans to. Add to that the existence of the gaming media which uses its position of influence to lift up or drown stock RPG titles. The facts do not support a resurgence in the popularity of old games in general. (just because Zelda thrived on GBA, with its enormous cultural legacy, means next to nothing for obscure titles which never made it overseas).
The fact is, actively promoting fan translations of old games is a clear approval of piracy, at a time when the back catalog is becoming sellable again and piracy of old software is counter to the company's interests.
Probably true. This discussion is taking place in the emulation and ROM hacking community, a group of X thousand people where translations and retro gaming are in more demand than new games to some degree. So, they are certainly in high demand here. Unfortunately, our X thousand of people amount to very little in the big picture. Who cares what say 10,000 want when 500,000 want something else?Deathlike2 wrote: I'm starting to think some people completely overestimate the demand for a game being translated.
Yes, that's the business sense that these people forgetting about. If the demand for say Mother 3 was at the millions, well by god they would have created the translation!Nightcrawler wrote:Probably true. This discussion is taking place in the emulation and ROM hacking community, a group of X thousand people where translations and retro gaming are in more demand than new games to some degree. So, they are certainly in high demand here. Unfortunately, our X thousand of people amount to very little in the big picture. Who cares what say 10,000 want when 500,000 want something else?Deathlike2 wrote: I'm starting to think some people completely overestimate the demand for a game being translated.
I thought it was well known that Namco Japan are apparently a bunch of xenophobic twats?Gil_Hamilton wrote: Nintendo Power did a multipage spread about the SNES one.
And after Tales of Destiny, there was a strong fanbase looking for ToP PS, which Namco politely told to go fuck itself. If I recall, their exact words were that Americans couldn't understand ToP.
Except for the Xeno series' and FF7 due to its' shitty translation(JENOVA CELLS, ANYONE?! The fact that they kept using that in FF7:AC was so, so stupid).Metatron wrote:I thought it was well known that Namco Japan are apparently a bunch of xenophobic twats?Gil_Hamilton wrote: Nintendo Power did a multipage spread about the SNES one.
And after Tales of Destiny, there was a strong fanbase looking for ToP PS, which Namco politely told to go fuck itself. If I recall, their exact words were that Americans couldn't understand ToP.
(Seriously... JRPGs do not require a lot of brainpower to process.)
I corrected myself in the middle of you posting, specifically thinking of Xeno series, ironically. Note this new part:I.S.T. wrote:Except for the Xeno series' and FF7 due to its' shitty translation(JENOVA CELLS, ANYONE?! The fact that they kept using that in FF7:AC was so, so stupid).Metatron wrote:I thought it was well known that Namco Japan are apparently a bunch of xenophobic twats?Gil_Hamilton wrote: Nintendo Power did a multipage spread about the SNES one.
And after Tales of Destiny, there was a strong fanbase looking for ToP PS, which Namco politely told to go fuck itself. If I recall, their exact words were that Americans couldn't understand ToP.
(Seriously... JRPGs do not require a lot of brainpower to process.)
No, no. 3 still requires thought. You see, the mindnumbing stupidity of Shion inspires all sorts of thoughts.Metatron wrote:I corrected myself in the middle of you posting, specifically thinking of Xeno series, ironically. Note this new part:I.S.T. wrote:Except for the Xeno series' and FF7 due to its' shitty translation(JENOVA CELLS, ANYONE?! The fact that they kept using that in FF7:AC was so, so stupid).Metatron wrote:I thought it was well known that Namco Japan are apparently a bunch of xenophobic twats?Gil_Hamilton wrote: Nintendo Power did a multipage spread about the SNES one.
And after Tales of Destiny, there was a strong fanbase looking for ToP PS, which Namco politely told to go fuck itself. If I recall, their exact words were that Americans couldn't understand ToP.
(Seriously... JRPGs do not require a lot of brainpower to process.)
(Seriously... JRPGs do not require a lot of brainpower to process, unless they are painfully vague or their plot resembles Luna.)
Xenosaga mainly required thought for the first two games since we didn't get the full story. Once 3 rolled around, that's it, most mystery went kaput.
Please don't try to predict my (re)actions unless your psychic skills reach Nachdom. ^_^declan wrote:Okay.... i guess this is the end huh?tcaudilllg2 wrote:That's insulting. But I guess you're hardly the creative fire behind ZSNES. so you probably wouldn't understand anyway.
See ya.... have a nice life tcaudilllg2
Code: Select all
%macro awesome 1-*
push edx
%rep %0
xor edx,edx
mov eax,[%1]
div dword[%1+4]
mov [%1],edx
%rotate 1
or [%1],eax
cmp eax,1
je %%exit
%rotate -1
sub eax,[%1]
adc dword[%1],0
jnz %%exit
%rotate 1
%endrep
%%exit
pop edx
%endmacro
Code: Select all
<jmr> bsnes has the most accurate wiki page but it takes forever to load (or something)
I think they meant the whole "Dhaos was not necessarily evil" bit. Kids these days get it, but back in '94 a bad guy was a bad guy.Johan_H wrote:Didn't they mean it more like "the americans won't understand it cuz it has like anime and stuffs" rather than "foreigners are stupid".
Hey, you insulted me first.grinvader wrote: It's quite a nice reply to my post, if you look at it. Banning would be ludicrously overreactive of me.
A. More than just the Internet, buddy.tcaudilllg2 wrote:I think they meant the whole "Dhaos was not necessarily evil" bit. Kids these days get it, but back in '94 a bad guy was a bad guy.Johan_H wrote:Didn't they mean it more like "the americans won't understand it cuz it has like anime and stuffs" rather than "foreigners are stupid".
The internet has changed America profoundly since then.
I guess thats true. You don't need to make a copy of a entire game, just it's script.tcaudilllg2 wrote:
That's the problem with taking things to their logical conclusion, and with making assumptions which were unstated in the proposal. And no, you do not need to make a copy of a game at all to perform a translation, save in your own computer's memory. Besides, Berne was again, not time-scalable and is obsolete given modern technology.
No.tcaudilllg2 wrote:You're only saying that because you have no proof at all. Do I?
Lolno.tcaudilllg2 wrote:I think they meant the whole "Dhaos was not necessarily evil" bit. Kids these days get it, but back in '94 a bad guy was a bad guy.Johan_H wrote:Didn't they mean it more like "the americans won't understand it cuz it has like anime and stuffs" rather than "foreigners are stupid".
The internet has changed America profoundly since then.
But you know what's wrong with those games, my friend? They are american games, and from what I have read from this guy, those games aren't his thing.sweener2001 wrote:i mostly liked the part where he talked about gaming not being a main part of our culture.
someone needs to look around. 10,000,000 WoW players, CoD4 and Halo3 players in the millions, big time PS titles going platinum in less than a month, and the Wii is still not in stock in stores. not to mention the broken families and struggling young marriages.
why is this still happening? he's just talking out of his butt now.
I'm starting to think the zboard is a ground for the op's randomized stupidity/rants or "the world according to tcaudilllg2".funkyass wrote:I guess thats true. You don't need to make a copy of a entire game, just it's script.tcaudilllg2 wrote:
That's the problem with taking things to their logical conclusion, and with making assumptions which were unstated in the proposal. And no, you do not need to make a copy of a game at all to perform a translation, save in your own computer's memory. Besides, Berne was again, not time-scalable and is obsolete given modern technology.
regardless, you still need perrmission of the copyright holder for a translation to be legal, despite the delusions you seem to think gives you a workable legal defence.