Systems ZSNES will not be ported to

General area for talk about ZSNES. The best place to ask for related questions as well as troubleshooting.

Moderator: ZSNES Mods

Player1
Hazed
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 10:03 pm
Contact:

Post by Player1 »

I have an idea. We could Zsnes fill out a short questionaire.

For example I am allowed to ask for roms yes/no
If yes is selected there should be shown a text like asking for roms is illegal.

You could make something for the 10 most annoying noob questions. would this be possible? I think it would be better than show a page with rules no one wants to read
Agozer
16-bit Corpse | Nyoron~
Posts: 3534
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Nokia Land

Post by Agozer »

Player1 wrote:I have an idea. We could Zsnes fill out a short questionaire.

For example I am allowed to ask for roms yes/no
If yes is selected there should be shown a text like asking for roms is illegal.

You could make something for the 10 most annoying noob questions. would this be possible? I think it would be better than show a page with rules no one wants to read
Uh, did you read the last few posts on page 1?
whicker: franpa is grammatically correct, and he still gets ripped on?
sweener2001: Grammatically correct this one time? sure. every other time? no. does that give him a right? not really.
Image
zoktar
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:35 am

the noob speaks

Post by zoktar »

ok this is just random noob thoughts, lets say that they are able to load a customized linux kernel into the psp, yay for alll, doesnt it come with an x86 emulator already? or is the asm more hardcore and bypasses any means of that type of emulator?, i recall linux having an x86 emulator for what it is used for i cant remember running wintendo now i cant check either and nowhere i can ssh to either, im afraid, but zsnes is my by far favorite snes emulator, and if that x86 linux emulator would infact interact with the written asm code in zsnes i would be very happy =), ok im sure iv missed alot of points here if anyone feels like showing me how impossible this is feel free, i like to learn =). cheers. sorry bout posting on the wrong threads im noob


sorry im talking about a psp port... or so....
Starman Ghost
Trooper
Posts: 535
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:26 am

Re: the noob speaks

Post by Starman Ghost »

zoktar wrote:ok this is just random noob thoughts, lets say that they are able to load a customized linux kernel into the psp, yay for alll, doesnt it come with an x86 emulator already? or is the asm more hardcore and bypasses any means of that type of emulator?, i recall linux having an x86 emulator for what it is used for i cant remember running wintendo now i cant check either and nowhere i can ssh to either, im afraid, but zsnes is my by far favorite snes emulator, and if that x86 linux emulator would infact interact with the written asm code in zsnes i would be very happy =), ok im sure iv missed alot of points here if anyone feels like showing me how impossible this is feel free, i like to learn =). cheers. sorry bout posting on the wrong threads im noob


sorry im talking about a psp port... or so....
No. Emulators are very processor intesive. So running an emulator over an emulator would most likely be way to much for the 333mhz cpu of the psp to handle.
[code]<Guo_Si> Hey, you know what sucks?
<TheXPhial> vaccuums
<Guo_Si> Hey, you know what sucks in a metaphorical sense?
<TheXPhial> black holes
<Guo_Si> Hey, you know what just isn't cool?
<TheXPhial> lava?[/code]
Noxious Ninja
Dark Wind
Posts: 1271
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Noxious Ninja »

No. You could install qemu, but it would be horribly slow. Even if you wrote a qemu core for the PSP processor, it would still be slow.
[u][url=http://bash.org/?577451]#577451[/url][/u]
Nightcrawler
Romhacking God
Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by Nightcrawler »

Not being x86 based architecture can no longer be an answer to why ZSNES can't be ported when we see the next generation of consoles.

They will have enough processing power to emulate an x86 system AND run ZSNES on it.

PSP doesn't fall in this catagory though.
[url=http://transcorp.romhacking.net]TransCorp[/url] - Home of the Dual Orb 2, Cho Mahou Tairyku Wozz, and Emerald Dragon SFC/SNES translations.
[url=http://www.romhacking.net]ROMhacking.net[/url] - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.
creaothceann
Seen it all
Posts: 2302
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 5:04 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by creaothceann »

You'll still need an emulator for non-x86 systems... then it becomes only an issue of file handling and controller input, I'd guess.
vSNES | Delphi 10 BPLs
bsnes launcher with recent files list
Nach
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 3904
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Solar powered park bench
Contact:

Post by Nach »

Nightcrawler wrote:Not being x86 based architecture can no longer be an answer to why ZSNES can't be ported when we see the next generation of consoles.

They will have enough processing power to emulate an x86 system AND run ZSNES on it.
And we wouldn't even need to do anything because they'd be running an existing version in an x86 OS in their emulator on their console.
May 9 2007 - NSRT 3.4, now with lots of hashing and even more accurate information! Go download it.
_____________
Insane Coding
rlbond
Hazed
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:13 am

Post by rlbond »

Add Playstation 2 to the list... It's a shame cuz SNES-Station sux...
Noxious Ninja wrote:We used to have a nice big thread on this. I guess it was lost in one of the crashes/hackings.

Anyway, this thread lists the systems/platforms that ZSNES will not be ported to. Post some, I'll edit them in.

Why will ZSNES never be ported to these systems? ZSNES is written largely in x86 assembler. This means that it will only run on x86 processors - computers using Intel, AMD, or VIA processors.

If you have a working knowledge of x86 assembler and/or C, and are willing to learn the internals of ZSNES to help make it portable, please post in the development forum.


Mac OS/PPC
The new Macs are using Intel processors. What about them?

Of course, who wants a mac anyway.
To truly own, you must own at all games.
Joe Camacho
Devil's Advocate
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Hmo. Son.

Post by Joe Camacho »

rlbond wrote:Of course, who wants a mac anyway.
You haven't used a Mac before, right?

I <3 Ibooks and Powerbooks
*Sometimes I edit my posts just to correct mistakes.
rlbond
Hazed
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:13 am

Post by rlbond »

Joe Camacho wrote:
rlbond wrote:Of course, who wants a mac anyway.
You haven't used a Mac before, right?

I <3 Ibooks and Powerbooks
only the crappy school ones, of course.

But without Counter-Strike and the other 90% of incompatible games, I'm not switching.
And one-button mice suck.
To truly own, you must own at all games.
adventure_of_link
Locksmith of Hyrule
Posts: 3634
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
Location: 255.255.255.255
Contact:

Post by adventure_of_link »

rlbond: Just because Macintosh is going to go the way of the Intel, doesn't mean they'll use x86. For all you know, Intel may develop a special PPC CPU for it.
If anyone wants to correct me, feel free to do so.
PS: I went to my college today to get some stuff taken care of, and they got three Macs in the student lounge.
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
rlbond
Hazed
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:13 am

Post by rlbond »

That's true.

And I mean the old crappy macs from high school.

Also, all their parts are proprietary. Why should I need a mac video card? And for the longest time you needed mac memory.

If they were compatible with most of the games out there, i might give one a try. But if i'm going to use another os, the first one will be linux.
To truly own, you must own at all games.
Nightcrawler
Romhacking God
Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by Nightcrawler »

EDIT: Post retracted. I was off my rocker when I wrote that.

Thanks for the correction guys.
Last edited by Nightcrawler on Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
[url=http://transcorp.romhacking.net]TransCorp[/url] - Home of the Dual Orb 2, Cho Mahou Tairyku Wozz, and Emerald Dragon SFC/SNES translations.
[url=http://www.romhacking.net]ROMhacking.net[/url] - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.
Noxious Ninja
Dark Wind
Posts: 1271
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Noxious Ninja »

Yeah. The new devkits run P4s.
[u][url=http://bash.org/?577451]#577451[/url][/u]
patman?
New Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:03 am

Post by patman? »

Yes, Macs are going to use x86.

Now, this disappoints me, because for now, they don't, and I'm going to have a Powerbook when I go away to college. Now I'm going to have to use something other than ZSNES, and that makes me sad! :cry:

Hopefully, there's some good SNES emulators for OS X. I love OS X, and feel that it's far superior to Windows.
Joe Camacho
Devil's Advocate
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Hmo. Son.

Post by Joe Camacho »

patman? wrote:Yes, Macs are going to use x86.

Now, this disappoints me, because for now, they don't, and I'm going to have a Powerbook when I go away to college. Now I'm going to have to use something other than ZSNES, and that makes me sad! :cry:

Hopefully, there's some good SNES emulators for OS X. I love OS X, and feel that it's far superior to Windows.
There's snes9x for mac.
*Sometimes I edit my posts just to correct mistakes.
patman?
New Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:03 am

Post by patman? »

Well, I don't even really like SNES9x for Windows, but I guess it's better than nothing.
Post Reply