Help for a linux noob

zolox · Post by **zolox** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:44 pm

Im running FC5 I got thru the ./configure ok but when i got to make this happens

make
g++ -o zsnes chips/sfxproc.o chips/fxemu2.o chips/dsp1proc.o chips/fxemu2b.o chips/fxemu2c.o chips/fxtable.o chips/sa1proc.o chips/sa1regs.o chips/dsp1emu.o chips/st10proc.o chips/seta10.o chips/dsp2proc.o chips/sdd1emu.o cpu/addrni.o cpu/dma.o cpu/dsp.o cpu/dspproc.o cpu/execute.o cpu/executec.o cpu/irq.o cpu/memory.o cpu/spc700.o cpu/stable.o cpu/table.o cpu/tableb.o cpu/tablec.o linux/copyvwin.o linux/sdlintrf.o linux/sdllink.o linux/sw_draw.o linux/zloaderw.o linux/ztcp.o linux/zipxw.o linux/zfilew.o dos/debug.o dos/joy.o dos/modemrtn.o dos/vesa2.o dos/initvid.o dos/sw.o dos/gppro.o dos/vesa12.o gui/gui.o gui/menu.o video/makev16b.o video/makev16t.o video/makevid.o video/mode716.o video/mode716b.o video/mode716d.o video/mode716e.o video/mode716t.o video/mode7.o video/mode7ext.o video/mv16tms.o video/newg162.o video/newgfx16.o video/newgfx2.o video/newgfx.o video/m716text.o video/2xsaiw.o video/procvid.o video/sw_draw.o video/hq2x16.o video/hq2x32.o video/hq3x16.o video/hq3x32.o video/hq4x16.o video/hq4x32.o cfgload.o endmem.o init.o initc.o uic.o patch.o ui.o vcache.o version.o zip/unzip.o zip/zpng.o effects/burn.o effects/water.o effects/smoke.o jma/7zlzma.o jma/crc32.o jma/iiostrm.o jma/inbyte.o jma/jma.o jma/lzma.o jma/lzmadec.o jma/winout.o jma/zsnesjma.o -pipe -I. -Wall -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -D__LINUX__ -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT -O3 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -fexpensive-optimizations -s -march=pentiumpro -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -lz -L/usr/lib -lSDL -lpthread -lpng -lm -L
g++: argument to '-L' missing

make: *** [zsnes] Error 1

anyone able to help?

bztunk · Post by **bztunk** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:54 pm

seems like configure fucked up

Post your autogen, autoconf, gcc, sdl, etc. versions?

zolox · Post by **zolox** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:06 pm

SDL support Version 1.2.9
NASM support NASM version 0.98.39 compiled on Feb 12 2006ZLib support Version 1.2.3
PNG support (png screenshots) Yes, version 1.2.8
OpenGL support Disabled, library not found
actually heres everything
./configure
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking for nasm... nasm
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for sdl-config... /usr/bin/sdl-config
checking for SDL - version >= 1.2.0... yes
checking for zlib - version >= 1.1.0... yes
checking for libpng - version >= 1.2.0... yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path
checking for glGetError in -lGL... no
checking for OpenGL... no
checking if you want gdb friendly executable... no
checking which processor class to optimize for... 686
checking for egrep... grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... no
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking whether sys/types.h defines makedev... no
checking sys/mkdev.h usability... no
checking sys/mkdev.h presence... no
checking for sys/mkdev.h... no
checking sys/sysmacros.h usability... yes
checking sys/sysmacros.h presence... yes
checking for sys/sysmacros.h... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: config.h is unchanged

ZSNES v1.41

SDL support Version 1.2.9
NASM support NASM version 0.98.39 compiled on Feb 12 2006ZLib support Version 1.2.3
PNG support (png screenshots) Yes, version 1.2.8
OpenGL support Disabled, library not found

The binary will be installed in /usr/local/bin

Configure complete, now type 'make' and pray.

paulguy · Post by **paulguy** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:30 pm

i think this is a known problem. go into the makefile and remove the -L

Post by **grinvader** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:51 pm

This is known and has been fixed for a year. Your fault, core dumped.
Precisely, more than a year:
r2139 | grinvader | 2005-02-18 01:49:02

zolox · Post by **zolox** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:51 pm

I'm sorry im really new but how do i do that just type "make -L"

adventure_of_link · Post by **adventure_of_link** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:08 pm

zolox wrote:I'm sorry im really new but how do i do that just type "make -L"

Go into the makefile with your favorite text editor (ee, vim, vi, nano, pico, kwrite, kate, etc) and remove the -L.

zolox · Post by **zolox** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:59 am

Ok when every i do ./configure it restores the Makefile also do i delete just -L or --L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -lz -L/usr/lib -lSDL -lpthread -lpng -lm -L

paulguy · Post by **paulguy** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:26 pm

./configure first then edit out just the lonely -L that has no parameters. although im sure there's a different solution to this? I don't seem to have this issue with the WIPs atleast.

Aerdan · Post by **Aerdan** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:29 pm

Workaround: Use a distribution that doesn't treat you like most scientists treat their lab rats.

zolox · Post by **zolox** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 10:49 pm

Lol what distro do you reccomend I'm about to try Ubuntu what do you suggest?

adventure_of_link · Post by **adventure_of_link** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:49 am

Fair warning: he's gonna go suggest Gentoo.

While it's not bad, it's pretty much all compiling.

I'd personally go with *buntu.

Post by **Agozer** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:58 am

adventure_of_link wrote:I'd personally go with *buntu.

adventure_of_link · Post by **adventure_of_link** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:01 am

Agozer wrote:
adventure_of_link wrote:I'd personally go with *buntu.

Oh yeah, if you've got any low end computers (eg: those that are about onpar with either windows 98se or 2000 minimum requirements) I'd also give Damn Small Linux a whirl.

Sorry I didn't mention this earlier.

Post by **Agozer** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:04 am

adventure_of_link wrote:
Agozer wrote:
adventure_of_link wrote:I'd personally go with *buntu.
Oh yeah, if you've got any low end computers (eg: those that are about onpar with either windows 98se or 2000 minimum requirements) I'd also give Damn Small Linux a whirl.

Sorry I didn't mention this earlier.

Well sure, it's damn small and all.

uh

you get the idea